A controversial northeast Denver land-swap proposal for a planned pocket park appears headed for City Council approval after fans and critics sounded off on the idea Monday.
The unusual deal — struck between Denver Parks and Recreation and the developer of the block-long Park Hill Commons — involves a simple exchange of similar-sized parcels, both about 0.35 acres, on either side of the 2800 block of Fairfax Street. On the east side, the city would build out the park within a mixed-use development of gleaming apartments, offices, retail and townhomes planned by HM Capital, and the developer would chip in $650,000 toward the park’s cost.
HM would get the city’s land across the street, a former Xcel substation purchased in 2015. HM plans to use that vacant property for surface parking in the short term.
Testimony during a hearing Monday night echoed a long-running debate over the possible look and feel of the park in the evolving proposal, which has spurred charges of favoritism toward the developer.
At a basic level, supporters — who slightly outnumbered opponents on the sign-up sheet — focused on the mechanics of the deal. It would jump-start the parks department’s so-far unfunded plan to build a park on the west site.
Some redevelopment has occurred on that side of the block, too.
“It just seems fairly obvious that it is a win for the neighborhood,” said Christina Cryer, who lives nearby on Forest Street. “We get a park sooner rather than later. We save taxpayer dollars. … We still keep the entire piece of land with the city of Denver, and the park is going to be identical.”
But critics largely seized on the symbolism of the proposed swap — including how, to them, it reflected broader socioeconomic currents that have brought an influx of well-off white residents to Park Hill. Several argued it wouldn’t feel like a public park.
One woman who is Latina and black said she and her family wouldn’t feel welcome if they wanted to have a barbecue in the new park.
Added Blair Taylor, who lives several blocks to the south: “I hope you truly consider the repercussions of gentrification in a neighborhood that is so rich with history.”
Related Articles
- August 18, 2018
Their park had been overrun by drugs and crime; then these southwest Denver neighbors made a change
- August 16, 2018
Denver Auditor’s office finds issue with two concessionaires, also questions parks department oversight
- August 12, 2018
Dog days of summer: Pups swim laps at Denver pool
- August 6, 2018
“Denveright” plans chart out new direction for rapidly expanding Denver’s transit, parks over two decades
Another speaker called it “a giveaway deal,” and others blasted the city process for a lack of transparency. “This was not a clean, honest, forthright deal for the citizens,” said Hank Bootz, a longtime parks activist.
The council’s members, while echoing some of those frustrations, voted 12-0 in favor of the proposal on first reading, signaling that it’s likely to win approval in the final vote Aug. 27. Several cited the funding for the park as a welcome prospect.
An earlier version of the land-swap proposal would have given control over the park’s features to the developer, but the current agreement puts those decisions in city hands. A parks official said he planned to convene a community design committee. But HM Capital’s proposed contribution likely won’t cover the entire cost of the park, the department recently said, leaving the city to cover the rest of a total cost estimated at $750,000 to $1 million.
Even in voting yes Monday, Councilman Rafael Espinoza said the deal would short-change the city.
“Much has been made about this being a gift, and it is — for the developer,” he said. “Again, I do not blame the developer for asking. I blame (city officials) for not pushing harder.”
